The playing position significantly influences return to sports and recurrences after an arthroscopic Bankart repair in competitive rugby players.

Background: The purpose of our study was to investigate the influence of the different rugby playing positions on return to sports, functional outcomes, and recurrences after an arthroscopic Bankart repair. Methods: A total of 88 rugby players were treated for anterior shoulder instability in our institution between 2010 and 2018. Functional outcomes, return to sports, recurrences, complications, and revisions rates were evaluated according to the playing position. Results: Overall, 73.8% of the patients returned to rugby and 60% returned at the same level as before the injury. The tight forwards and outside backs experienced a significant decrease in their competitive level after surgery, and showed the lowest functional outcomes. The tight forwards and outside backs showed a statistically significant increase in recurrence and revision rates, and an OR for recurrence of 12.8 and 9.6, respectively. Discussion: The playing position significantly influenced return to sports and recurrences after an arthroscopic Bankart repair in competitive rugby players. Specifically, the tight forwards and outside backs have returned to a lower level than they had before surgery, showed the lowest functional outcomes, and a significant increase in recurrences and revisions rates than the other groups.

Evaluación y seguimiento del deportista operado por inestabilidad glenohumeral / Evaluation and follow-up of athlete operated for glenohumeral instability

Existe una falta de consenso en la literatura sobre cómo debe ser la evaluación y seguimiento del deportista operado por inestabilidad glenohumeral. Por lo tanto, el objetivo del siguiente estudio fue realizar una revisión crítica de la literatura sobre la variabilidad en los criterios utilizados para la evaluación y el seguimiento de los pacientes sometidos a una cirugía de estabilización glenohumeral. El score de WOSI, es una herramienta sensible que puede detectar y cuantificar cambios pequeños pero clínicamente importantes en pacientes operados de inestabilidad del hombro. Además consideramos necesario utilizar un score que evalúe específicamente el desempeño del hombro durante el retorno al deporte como puede ser por ejemplo el score de ASOSS. Otro aspecto fundamental al evaluar los resultados de la cirugía es la recuperación de la movilidad en los cuatro planos principales del hombro (flexión anterior, abducción y rotación interna y externa) que debe medirse en forma objetiva con un goniómetro. La medición de la fuerza es la variable de mayor controversia en la literatura. A pesar de esto, consideramos que es necesario evaluar la recuperación de la fuerza sobre todo en los deportes donde el hombro tiene una implicancia importante por ejemplo los deportes de contacto, overhead y las artes marciales. La TAC la realizamos a los tres meses del pop para evaluar en forma precisa la consolidación y la posición adecuada del injeto óseo. Para evaluar la artrosis glenohumeral utilizamos la clasificación de Samilson Prieto y se recomienda hacer una radiografía anual para su evaluación. Deben registrarse en forma prospectiva todas las complicaciones intraoperatorias y postoperatorias así como las revisiones. Definimos como recurrencia a cualquier episodio de luxación o subluxación en el postoperatorio asi como la presencia de aprehensión que le impide al paciente realizar las actividades de su vida diaria o deporte

Arthroscopic Stabilization After a First-Time Dislocation: Collision Versus Contact Athletes.

BACKGROUND: There is no universally accepted definition of "contact" or "collision" sports in the literature. The few available studies evaluating contact and collision sports consider them to be synonymous. However, athletes in collision sports purposely hit or collide with each other or with inanimate objects with greater force and frequency than in contact sports, which could jeopardize functional outcomes. PURPOSE: To compare the functional outcomes, return to sports, and recurrences in a series of contact and collision athletes with a first-time anterior shoulder dislocation treated using arthroscopic stabilization with suture anchors. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A total of 56 athletes were enrolled in this study, including 22 contact athletes and 34 collision athletes. All athletes underwent arthroscopic shoulder stabilization using suture anchors. Range of motion, the Rowe score, a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and the Athletic Shoulder Outcome Scoring System (ASOSS) were used to assess functional outcomes. Return to sports and recurrences were also evaluated. RESULTS: The mean age at the time of surgery was 22.2 years, and the mean follow-up was 62.4 months (range, 36-94 months). No significant difference in shoulder motion was found between preoperative and postoperative results or between the contact and collision groups. The Rowe, VAS, and ASOSS scores showed statistical improvement in both groups after surgery (P = .001). Patients in the contact group returned to sports significantly faster than those in the collision group (5.2 vs 6.9 months, respectively; P = .01). In all, 43 athletes (76.8%) returned to near-preinjury sports activity levels (≥90% recovery) after surgery: 86.4% of patients in the contact group and 70.6% in the collision group (P = .04). The total recurrence rate was 8.9%. There were 5 recurrences (14.7%) in the collision group and no recurrences in the contact group (P < .01). CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic stabilization for anterior instability of the shoulder is a reliable procedure with respect to shoulder function, range of motion, and postoperative return to sports in contact and collision athletes. Compared with the contact group (0%), the collision group yielded a higher failure rate (14.7%). Moreover, patients in the contact group returned significantly faster (5.2 vs 6.9 months, respectively) and to and more returned to preinjury or near-preinjury activity levels (86.4% vs 70.6% of patients, respectively) than patients in the collision group.

Vuelta al deporte luego de la osteosíntesis de fracturas mediodiafisarias de clavícula en deportistas / Return-to-sport after plate fixation of midshaft clavicular fractures in athletes

Diferentes trabajos recientes prospectivos randomizados apoyan la osteosíntesis con placas de las fracturas mediodiafisarias de clavícula. Sin embargo la seguridad y eficacia de este tratamiento así como la vuelta al deporte no está bien documentado en atletas. El objetivo del siguiente trabajo es analizar los resultados funcionales, el porcentaje de vuelta al deporte y las complicaciones de un grupo de atletas tratados por fracturas mediodiafisarias desplazadas de clavícula con placas precontorneadas bloqueadas. Materiales y Métodos: Un total de 54 atletas con fracturas desplazadas mediodiafisarias de clavícula fueron tratados mediante osteosíntesis con placas precontorneadas entre Noviembre del 2008 y Diciembre del 2012. El promedio de seguimiento fue de 22,4 meses. Los pacientes completaron un cuestionario sobre el momento de la vuelta al deporte y la evolución del tratamiento. Los resultados funcionales se evaluaron con el score de Constant y la versión abreviada del DASH (quick DASH). El dolor se evaluó con la escala visual análoga. (VAS). Se evaluaron las rx en forma seriada para identificar el tiempo hasta la consolidación, la pseudoartrosis y las consolidaciones viciosas. Resultados: De los 54 pacientes, 53 pudieron volver al deporte, 94% retornaron al mismo nivel que tenían previo a la lesión. El tiempo promedio de vuelta al deporte fue de 68 días (rango 5-180 días) Nueve (16,6%) de los pacientes volvieron antes de las 6 semanas, 40 (74%) volvieron entre las 6 y las 12 semanas y 5 pacientes (92%) volvieron luego de las 12 semanas. El score de Constant promedio fue de 94.l±5.2 (rango 78 a 100), el Quick DASH promedio fue de DA ± 4.7 (rango 0-7.1). El promedio de la EVA durante el seguimiento fue de 0.29 ± 1 (rango 0-5)...

Risk Factor Analysis for 30-Day Mortality After Primary THA in a Single Institution.

The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of, and associated risk factors for, 30-day perioperative death following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Data of all the patients were compiled from the computerized total joint registry at a single institution. Between May 1993 and May 2006, 3,232 consecutive primary THA (2,453 elective and 779 nonelective) were performed. Eleven deaths occurred during the first month after surgery (0.34 %). Thirty-day mortality rate after elective THA was 0.08 % (two of 2,453 IC 95 %(0-0.4)). The 30-day mortality rate after nonelective THA was 1.15 % (nine of 779 IC 95 %(0.7-2.4). To analyze the factors that could have contributed with death, we conducted a 4-to-1 nested case-control study. Control cases were strictly matched by sex, age, surgeon, prosthesis fixation mode, and date of surgery. Conditional logistic regression was used to evaluate the association of risk factors with mortality. Elective surgery was associated with a lower risk of mortality with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.07 (95 % CI 0.008-0.6);p = 0.015. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score III-IV increased the mortality risk 13 times (OR 13.7; 95 % CI 1.6-114.8). Cardiovascular disease increased the risk for mortality eight times (OR 8.83 (95 % CI 1.78-43.6). Time delay before surgery showed a trend towards significance (p = 0.06). Aggressive vs. nonaggressive thromboembolism prophylaxis and the amount of blood transfusions required were not associated with a higher risk of death. Patients undergoing a THA due to fractures, patients with high ASA score, and those with cardiovascular disease were the highest risk factors for 30-day mortality after primary THA.